Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums



If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important.  If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.


Home >> Browse Vulnerability Assessment Database >> Debian Local Security Checks >> [DSA1192] DSA-1192-1 mozilla


Vulnerability Assessment Details

[DSA1192] DSA-1192-1 mozilla

Vulnerability Assessment Summary
DSA-1192-1 mozilla

Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment

Several security related problems have been discovered in Mozilla and
derived products such as Mozilla Thunderbird. The Common
Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following
vulnerabilities:
Fernando Ribeiro discovered that a vulnerability in the getRawDER
function permits remote attackers to cause a denial of service
(hang) and possibly execute arbitrary code.
Daniel Bleichenbacher recently described an implementation error
in RSA signature verification that cause the application to
incorrectly trust SSL certificates.
Priit Laes reported that a JavaScript regular expression can
trigger a heap-based buffer overflow which permits remote attackers
to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code.
A vulnerability has been discovered that permits remote attackers
to bypass the security model and inject content into the sub-frame
of another site.
Georgi Guninski demonstrated that even with JavaScript disabled in
mail (the default) a possible hacker can still execute JavaScript when a
mail message is viewed, replied to, or forwarded.
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Firefox, Thunderbird and
SeaMonkey permit remote attackers to cause a denial of service,
corrupt memory, and possibly execute arbitrary code.
For the stable distribution (sarge) these problems have been fixed in
version 1.7.8-1sarge7.3.1.
We recommend that you upgrade your Mozilla packages.


Solution : http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1192
Network Security Threat Level: High

Networks Security ID: 20042

Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: This script is (C) 2006 Michel Arboi

Cables, Connectors


Dell PowerEdge R720 Server - 2x8c CPU,256Gb RAM, 128Gb SSD/3x600Gb SAS, Proxmox picture

Dell PowerEdge R720 Server - 2x8c CPU,256Gb RAM, 128Gb SSD/3x600Gb SAS, Proxmox

$340.00



Dell PowerEdge M610 Blade Server E5620@2.2GHZ (6x)8GB RAM (2x)146GB 15K SAS HDD picture

Dell PowerEdge M610 Blade Server E5620@2.2GHZ (6x)8GB RAM (2x)146GB 15K SAS HDD

$75.00



Supermicro 4U 36 Bay Storage Server 2.4Ghz 8-C 128GB 1x1280W Rails TrueNAS ZFS picture

Supermicro 4U 36 Bay Storage Server 2.4Ghz 8-C 128GB 1x1280W Rails TrueNAS ZFS

$721.06



H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 256GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W picture

H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 256GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W

$2512.18



Dell PowerEdge R720XD Xeon E5-2680 V2 2.8GHz 20 Cores 256GB RAM 12x4TB picture

Dell PowerEdge R720XD Xeon E5-2680 V2 2.8GHz 20 Cores 256GB RAM 12x4TB

$510.00



DELL PowerEdge R730 Server 2x E5-2690v3 2.6GHz =24 Cores 32GB H730 4xRJ45 picture

DELL PowerEdge R730 Server 2x E5-2690v3 2.6GHz =24 Cores 32GB H730 4xRJ45

$275.00



Dell PowerEdge R730XD 28 Core Server 2X Xeon E5-2680 V4 H730 128GB RAM No HDD picture

Dell PowerEdge R730XD 28 Core Server 2X Xeon E5-2680 V4 H730 128GB RAM No HDD

$389.99



Dell PowerEdge R620 Server 2x Xeon  E5-2620 @ 2.0GHz 64GB RAM NO HDDs picture

Dell PowerEdge R620 Server 2x Xeon E5-2620 @ 2.0GHz 64GB RAM NO HDDs

$108.96



Dell PowerEdge R820 Server 4x E5-4620 2.2GHz 32-Core Total 256GB 0HD 2x 1100w  picture

Dell PowerEdge R820 Server 4x E5-4620 2.2GHz 32-Core Total 256GB 0HD 2x 1100w

$315.00



Dell PowerEdge R430 3.5 1U 2x E5-2690 v3 2.6ghz 24-Cores 256gb 4x Trays 2x 550w picture

Dell PowerEdge R430 3.5 1U 2x E5-2690 v3 2.6ghz 24-Cores 256gb 4x Trays 2x 550w

$289.99



Discussions

No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.