Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums
If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important. If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.
Vulnerability Assessment Details
Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment
These remote packages are missing security patches :
Tavis Ormandy discovered a format string vulnerability in ImageMagick's file
name handling. Specially crafted file names could cause a program using
ImageMagick to crash, or possibly even cause execution of arbitrary code.
Since ImageMagick can be used in custom printing systems, this also might lead
to privilege escalation (execute code with the printer spooler's rights).
However, Ubuntu's standard printing system does not use ImageMagick, thus there
is no risk of privilege escalation in a standard installation.
ImageMagick is also commonly used by web frontends
if these accept image
uploads with arbitrary file names, this could also lead to remote privilege
Upgrade to :
- imagemagick-18.104.22.168-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
- libmagick++6-22.214.171.124-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
- libmagick++6-dev-126.96.36.199-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
- libmagick6-188.8.131.52-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
- libmagick6-dev-184.108.40.206-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
- perlmagick-220.127.116.11-1ubuntu1.4 (Ubuntu 4.10)
Network Security Threat Level: High
Networks Security ID:
Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: Ubuntu Security Notice (C) 2005 Canonical, Inc. / NASL script (C) 2005 Michel Arboi
|Fintie Cases Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 Ultra Slim Lightweight Smart Shell Stand
|Leather Book Case Cover Pouch for Samsung SM-T377VZKAVZW Galaxy TabE/Tab E 8.0
|Samsung PM871a Series 256GB SSD SATA3 6.0Gb/s NAND 2.5" 7mm Model : MZ-7LN256A
|2PK Compatible MLT 208L Toner Chip For Samsung ML-1635 3475 SCX5635 5835
No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.