Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums



If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important.  If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.


Home >> Browse Vulnerability Assessment Database >> SMTP problems >> Sendmail prescan() overflow


Vulnerability Assessment Details

Sendmail prescan() overflow

Vulnerability Assessment Summary
Checks the version number

Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment

The remote sendmail server, according to its version number,
may be vulnerable to a remote buffer overflow permiting remote
users to gain root rights.

Sendmail versions from 5.79 to 8.12.9 are vulnerable.
Solution : Upgrade to Sendmail ver 8.12.10.
See also : http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010287.html


NOTE: manual patches do not change the version numbers.
Vendors who have released patched versions of sendmail
may still falsely show vulnerability.

*** Nessus reports this vulnerability using only
*** the banner of the remote SMTP server. Therefore,
*** this might be a false positive.

Network Security Threat Level: High

Networks Security ID: 8641, 8649

Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: This script is Copyright (C) 2003-2006 Tenable Network Security

Cables, Connectors

Lot of (5) Seagate IBM ST3000DM001 3TB 3.5" SAS Server Hard Drives
$99.0
Lot of (5) Seagate IBM ST3000DM001 3TB 3.543R1980 ATA Hard Drive Bay Adapter II
$29.99
43R1980 ATA Hard Drive Bay Adapter II  pictureIBM 06P5759 06P5755 24P3691 36GB 10K SCSI U160 Hard Drive with Server Tray
$34.95
IBM 06P5759 06P5755 24P3691 36GB 10K SCSI U160 Hard Drive with Server Tray pictureIBM 738044U System x3500 M3 Server Xeon 2.53GHz CPU, 4 Hot Swap 500GB 24GB RAM
$495.0
IBM 738044U System x3500 M3 Server Xeon 2.53GHz CPU, 4 Hot Swap 500GB 24GB RAM picture


Discussions

No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.