Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums



If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important.  If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.


Home >> Browse Vulnerability Assessment Database >> Red Hat Local Security Checks >> RHSA-2005-357: gzip


Vulnerability Assessment Details

RHSA-2005-357: gzip

Vulnerability Assessment Summary
Check for the version of the gzip packages

Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment


An updated gzip package is now available.

This update has been rated as having low security impact by the Red Hat
Security Response Team.

The gzip package contains the GNU gzip data compression program.

A bug was found in the way zgrep processes file names. If a user can be
tricked into running zgrep on a file with a carefully crafted file name,
arbitrary commands could be executed as the user running zgrep. The Common
Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name
CVE-2005-0758 to this issue.

A bug was found in the way gunzip modifies permissions of files being
decompressed. A local attacker with write permissions in the directory in
which a victim is decompressing a file could remove the file being written
and replace it with a hard link to a different file owned by the victim.
gunzip then gives the linked file the permissions of the uncompressed file.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has
assigned the name CVE-2005-0988 to this issue.

A directory traversal bug was found in the way gunzip processes the -N
flag. If a victim decompresses a file with the -N flag, gunzip fails to
sanitize the path which could result in a file owned by the victim being
overwritten. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project
(cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2005-1228 to this issue.

Users of gzip should upgrade to this updated package, which contains
backported patches to correct these issues.




Solution : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-357.html
Network Security Threat Level: High

Networks Security ID:

Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: This script is Copyright (C) 2005 Tenable Network Security

Cables, Connectors


SanDisk 512GB Ultra Drive Dual Go USB Type-C Flash Drive Green SDDDC3-512G-G46G picture

SanDisk 512GB Ultra Drive Dual Go USB Type-C Flash Drive Green SDDDC3-512G-G46G

$49.99



SanDisk 512GB Ultra Luxe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Flash Drive - SDCZ74-512G-G46 picture

SanDisk 512GB Ultra Luxe USB 3.2 Gen 1 Flash Drive - SDCZ74-512G-G46

$35.99



SanDisk 128GB Ultra Flair USB 3.0 Flash Drive - SDCZ73-128G-G46 picture

SanDisk 128GB Ultra Flair USB 3.0 Flash Drive - SDCZ73-128G-G46

$12.99



SanDisk 256GB Ultra USB 3.0 Flash Drive - SDCZ48-256G-U46 picture

SanDisk 256GB Ultra USB 3.0 Flash Drive - SDCZ48-256G-U46

$19.99



Lenovo USB 16TB 3.0 USB Flash Drive Thumb Disk Silver Transfer Metal Memory picture

Lenovo USB 16TB 3.0 USB Flash Drive Thumb Disk Silver Transfer Metal Memory

$24.99



Mechanical Style Flash Drive USB 3.0 High Speed 16TB Large Capacity Waterproof  picture

Mechanical Style Flash Drive USB 3.0 High Speed 16TB Large Capacity Waterproof

$8.37



Sandisk 16GB 32GB 64GB 128GB Cruzer Blade Flash Drive Memory Stick USB Lot Pack picture

Sandisk 16GB 32GB 64GB 128GB Cruzer Blade Flash Drive Memory Stick USB Lot Pack

$4.99



2TB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Memory Photo Stick for iPhone Android iPad Type C 3 IN1 picture

2TB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Memory Photo Stick for iPhone Android iPad Type C 3 IN1

$13.00



1TB/2TB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Thumb U Disk Memory Stick Pen PC Laptop Storage lot picture

1TB/2TB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Thumb U Disk Memory Stick Pen PC Laptop Storage lot

$388.39



USB 3.0 Flash Drive 32GB 64GB 128GB Memory Stick Thumb Stick Lot Pack picture

USB 3.0 Flash Drive 32GB 64GB 128GB Memory Stick Thumb Stick Lot Pack

$399.99



Discussions

No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.