Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums

If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important.  If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.

Home >> Browse Vulnerability Assessment Database >> Red Hat Local Security Checks >> RHSA-2004-681: samba

Vulnerability Assessment Details

RHSA-2004-681: samba

Vulnerability Assessment Summary
Check for the version of the samba packages

Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment

Updated samba packages that fix an integer overflow vulnerability are now
available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1

Samba provides file and printer sharing services to SMB/CIFS clients.

Greg MacManus of iDEFENSE Labs has discovered an integer overflow bug in
Samba versions prior to 3.0.10. An authenticated remote user could exploit
this bug which may lead to arbitrary code execution on the Samba server.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project ( has
assigned the name CVE-2004-1154 to this issue.

Users of Samba should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain
backported security patches, and are not vulnerable to these issues.

Solution :
Network Security Threat Level: High

Networks Security ID:

Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: This script is Copyright (C) 2004 Tenable Network Security

Cables, Connectors

HP 752081-002 480GB 2.5" SAS Solid State SSD 752813-001 752840 HSSC0480S5XNNMRI
HP 752081-002 480GB 2.5SAMSUNG PM830 SOLID STATE DRIVES | MZMPC128HBFU-000H1 | 128GB | LOT OF 5
SAMSUNG PM830 SOLID STATE DRIVES | MZMPC128HBFU-000H1 | 128GB | LOT OF 5 pictureToshiba 32GB Solid State Solid State Drive, Pre-Owned THNSNX032GTNT
Toshiba 32GB Solid State Solid State Drive, Pre-Owned THNSNX032GTNT pictureSanDisk Z400s 2.5" 32GB SATA III Internal Solid State Drive SD8SBAT-032G-1122-PU
SanDisk Z400s 2.5


No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.