Vulnerability Assessment & Network Security Forums
If through a vulnerability assessment, a network security issue is detected for the vulnerability below, applying the appropriate security patches in a timely matter is very important. If you have detected that your system has already been compromised, following CERT's Network Security recovery document will assist with recommended steps for system recovery.
Vulnerability Assessment Details
GnuPG: Multiple vulnerabilities
Detailed Explanation for this Vulnerability Assessment
The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-200612-03
(GnuPG: Multiple vulnerabilities)
Hugh Warrington has reported a boundary error in GnuPG, in the
"ask_outfile_name()" function from openfile.c: the
make_printable_string() function could return a string longer than
expected. Additionally, Tavis Ormandy of the Gentoo Security Team
reported a design error in which a function pointer can be incorrectly
A remote attacker could entice a user to interactively use GnuPG on a
crafted file and trigger the boundary error, which will result in a
buffer overflow. They could also entice a user to process a signed or
encrypted file with gpg or gpgv, possibly called through another
application like a mail client, to trigger the dereference error. Both
of these vulnerabilities would result in the execution of arbitrary
code with the permissions of the user running GnuPG. gpg-agent, gpgsm
and other tools are not affected.
There is no known workaround at this time.
All GnuPG users should upgrade to the latest version:
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "=app-crypt/gnupg-1.4*"
Network Security Threat Level: Medium
Networks Security ID:
Vulnerability Assessment Copyright: (C) 2006 Michel Arboi
|500GB (HDS725050KLAT80) Apple G4 Xserve RAID Xraid with Free ADM Drive Tray
|NEW Sony SV13 SV15 Z235 Z217 SSD SLIM 1.8" LIF 256GB MZ-RPC2560/0SO RAID MLC SSD
|Adaptec ASR-5085 2249100-R 512MB SAS RAID Controller PCIex8
|■9622 #OEM GENUINE IBM BLADECENTER RAID Battery BACKUP MODULE
No Discussions have been posted on this vulnerability.